Čes. stomatol. Prakt. zub. lék. (Czech Dental Journal) 2012; 112(4): 79-85 | DOI: 10.51479/cspzl.2012.036
A Contemplation about the Importance of Prosthetic Defect Classification Systems in Contemporary Dentistry
- Stomatologická klinika LF UK a FN, Hradec Králové
Introduction: The aim of the dental care is ensuring the biological and social functions of dentition throughout all the life of an individual. Planning prosthetic reconstruction is based on the analysis of all available data (e. g., history, clinical findings, imaging techniques, etc.). There are several classifications of the dental arch defects which determine the type of the defect. Some deal with the placement of the remainig teeth and gaps, others with shortened dental arches and gaps, presence of so-caled supporting zones or teeth having regard to the transfer of the chewing pressure.
Objectives: The authors describe the seven best-known classification systems according to Voldřich, Kennedy, Wild, Eichner, Witter, Körber, and Tvrdoň. They describe the distribution of prosthetic teeth defects to certain groups or classes in terms of conventional and implantology prosthetic dentistry. They present the most common treatment options prosthetic defects - frontal gap, unilaterally or bilaterally shortened dental arch, loss of half of the dental arch, toothless jaw, the first two prosthetic defects are divided into subgroups, differing number of teeth lost. They recapitulate the current possibilities of reconstruction of the above defects using implantology and conventional prosthetic dentistry. The authors discuss this issue in the context of current possibilities of prosthetic treatment modes and try to answer the question, if this knowledge still remains useful and reveals practical use.
Keywords: prosthetic dentistry; classifications of dental defects; supporting zones; shortened dental arch; dental implantology; conventional and alternative prosthetic treatment
Published: December 1, 2012 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Bartáková, S., Prachár, P., Vaněk, J.: Klasifikace defektů chrupu I. StomaTeam, 2008, č. 2, s. 15-18.
- Bartáková, S., Prachár, P., Vaněk, J.: Klasifikace defektů chrupu II. StomaTeam, 2008, č. 3, s. 14-19.
- Dostálová, T.: Fixní a snímatelná protetika. Praha, Grada Publishing, 2004, s. 12-18.
- Krňoulová, J, Hubálková, H.: Fixní zubní náhrady. Praha, Quintessenz, 2002, s. 24-29.
- Marxkors, R.: Lehrbuch der zahnärztlichen Prothetik, 3. vyd. Köln, München, Deutsche Zahnärzte Verlag DÄV-Hanser, 2000, s. 230 až 262.
- Strub, J. R., Türp, J. C., Witkovski, S., Hürzeler, M. B., Kern, M.: Curriculum Prothetik, Band III. Berlin, Quintessenz Verlags-GmbH, 1994, s. 865-872.
- Šimůnek, A., a kol.: Dentální implantologie, 2. vyd. Hradec Králové, Nucleus, 2001, s. 43-52.
- Tvrdoň, M., a kol.: Protetická stomatológia, Bratislava, Science, 1999, s. 77-89.
Go to original source...
- Vacek, M., Bittner, J. Gnatologie. Praha, Avicenum, 1986, s. 175.
- Voldřich, M., Mareš, J., Černý, K., Rus, R. Učebnice stomatologické protetiky, 1. vyd. Praha, Státní zdravotnické nakladatelství, 1955, s. 244-249.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.