Čes. stomatol. Prakt. zub. lék. (Czech Dental Journal) 2024; 124(1): 3-14 | DOI: 10.51479/cspzl.2023.009

EVALUATION OF THE CLINICAL SUCCESS OF 56 AUTOTRANSPLANTED TEETH – A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Starosta M.1, 2, Bartoš M.1, Foltán R.1
1 Stomatologická klinika, Univerzita Karlova, 1. lékařská fakulta, a Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice v Praze
2 Zubní praxe Perioimplants, Olomouc

Introduction, aim: At present, tooth autotransplantation is considered one of the therapeutic methods for the replacement of lost teeth. In the last 30 years, the method of tooth autotransplantation has been developed and refined and has become a basic knowledge of dental practitioners. The aim of this clinical retrospective study was to examine children and adult patients with tooth autotransplantation and obtain survival and success rates. Another aim was to determine other specifics of autotransplantation in each group with conclusions relevant for clinical practice.

Methods: The study population consisted of the patients referred consecutively for tooth autotransplantation to a specialist department between years 2016 and 2021. The specialization of the referring dentist, the suitability and feasibility of the transplantation, and the donor and recipient area of the tooth graft were recorded. In 2022, clinical and radiological evaluation of the autotransplanted teeth was performed. Patients were divided into two groups according to age in time of autotransplantation, namely under 18 years and over 18 years.

Results: Overall, 73 patients in the age range of 10–59 years were referred for autotransplantation. The mean age was 21.43 years with a median age of 17 years. Autotransplantation was not recommended in 12 patients. A total of 68 autotransplantations were performed, but at the time of examination, 12 did not meet the minimum 6-month follow up, so they were excluded from the evaluation. A total of 56 autotransplants were evaluated. In the group of children, there were 27 patients aged 10–17 years who underwent autotransplantation of at least one permanent tooth. A total of 34 teeth were transplanted. The evaluation of the transplanted teeth was performed 6–50 months after the transplantation with a mean follow-up time of 24 months. The survival rate was 100% and the success rate was 91%. The adult group consisted of 22 patients aged 18–59 years and a total of 22 teeth were transplanted. The evaluation of the transplanted teeth was performed 6–72 months after transplantation with a mean of 33 months. The survival rate was 95%, the success rate 77%.

Conclusion: The use of autograft to replace undeveloped or lost teeth was most often indicated by orthodontists. In the patients under 18 years of age, the premolars are the predominant donor area and recipient area. In patients over 18 years of age, the third molars are the predominant donor area and the mandibular molars the predominant recipient area. Both age groups have high survival and success rates of autograft and this procedure can be considered as a predictable method of tooth replacement.

Keywords: tooth transplantation, tooth autotransplantation, indication, survival rate, success rate

Received: June 19, 2023; Revised: August 28, 2023; Accepted: August 28, 2023; Prepublished online: February 29, 2024; Published: March 11, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Starosta M, Bartoš M, Foltán R. EVALUATION OF THE CLINICAL SUCCESS OF 56 AUTOTRANSPLANTED TEETH – A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. Čes. stomatol. Prakt. zub. lék. 2024;124(1):3-14. doi: 10.51479/cspzl.2023.009.
Download citation

References

  1. Tsukiboshi M. Autogenous tooth transplantation: a reevaluation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1993; 13(2): 120-49.
  2. Andreasen JO, Paulsen HU, Yu Z, Ahlquist R, Bayer T, Schwartz O. A long-term study of 370 autotransplanted premolars. Part I. Surgical procedures and standardized techniques for monitoring healing. Eur J Orthod. 1990; 12(1): 3-13. doi: 10.1093/ejo/12.1.3 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Andreasen JO, Paulsen HU, Yu Z, Bayer T, Schwartz O. A long-term study of 370 autotransplanted premolars. Part II. Tooth survival and pulp healing subsequent to transplantation. Eur J Orthod. 1990; 12(1): 14-24. doi: 10.1093/ejo/12.1.14 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. 4 Andreasen JO, Paulsen HU, Yu Z, Schwartz O. A long-term study of 370 autotransplanted premolars. Part III. Periodontal healing subsequent to transplantation. Eur J Orthod. 1990; 12(1): 25-37. doi: 10.1093/ejo/12.1.25 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. 5 Andreasen JO, Paulsen HU, Yu Z, Bayer T. A long-term study of 370 autotransplanted premolars. Part IV. Root development subsequent to transplantation. Eur J Orthod. 1990; 12(1): 38-50. doi: 10.1093/ejo/12.1.38 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Alpmani K, Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA. Autotransplantation of teeth in human: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Invest. 2015; 19: 1157-1179. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Moorrees CF, Fanning EA, Hunt EE Jr. Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. J Dent Res. 1963; 42: 490-502. doi: 10.1177/00220345630420062701 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Diogenes A, Ruparel NB. Regenerative endodontic procedures: Clinical outcomes. Dent Clin North Am. 2017; 64(1): 111-125. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2016.08.004 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Planer J, Tycová H, Kučera J, Langová K. Autotransplantace. Ortodoncie. 2017; 26(3): 126-137.
  10. Tsukiboshi M. Autotransplantation of teeth: requirements for predictable success. Dent Traumatol. 2002; 18: 157-80. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.00118.x Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Hammarstrom L, Blomlof L, Lindskog S. Dynamics of dentoalveolar ankylosis and associated root resorption. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1989; 5: 163-175. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1989.tb00354.x Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Kostečka F. Transplantace zubních zárodků. Rozpravy II. třídy České akademie. 1938; 47(5): 1-33.
  13. Stange KM, Lindsten R, Bjerklin K. Autotransplantation of premolars to the maxillary incisor region: a long term follow-up of 12-22 years. Eur J Orthod. 2016; 38: 508-515. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv078 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Michl I, Nolte D, Tschammier C. Premolar autotransplantation in juvenile dentition: quantitative assessment of vertical bone and soft tissue growth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017; 124: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.02.002 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Ong D, Itskovich Y, Dance G. Autotransplantation: a viable treatment option for adolescent patients with significantly compromised teeth. Aust Dent J. 2016; 61: 396-407. doi: 10.1111/adj.12420 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Rohof ECM, Kerdijk W, Jansma J, Livas CH, Ren Y. Autotransplantation of teeth with incomplete root formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investigations. 2018; 22: 1613-1624. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2408-z Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Schwarz O, Bergmann P, Klausen B. Autotransplantation of human teeth. Life-table analysis of prognostic factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997; 5: 12-18. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(85)80036-3 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Maddalone M, Bianco E, Spolnik KJ, Mirabelli L, Gagliani M, Fabbro MD. Immediate autotransplantation of molars with closed apex. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022; 23(4): 453-459. Go to original source...
  19. Yu HJ, Jia P, Lv Z, Qiu LX. Autotransplantation of third molars with completely formed roots into surgically created sockets and fresh extraction sockets: a 10-year comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 46(4): 531-538. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.12.007 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Suwanapong T, Waikakul A, Boonsiriseth K, Ruangsawasdi N. Pre- and peri-operative factors infuence autogenous tooth transplantation healing in insufcient bone sites. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21: 325. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01686-x Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Hwang LA, Chang CY, Su WC, Chang CW, Huang CY. Rapid prototyping-assisted tooth autotransplantation is associated with a reduced root canal treatment rate: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22: 25. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02058-9 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. 22 Kristerson L, Andreasen JO. The effect of splinting upon periodontal and pulpal healing after autotransplantation of mature and immature permanent incisors in monkeys. Int J Oral Surg. 1983; 12: 239-249. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(83)80049-0 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Dioguardi M, Quarta C, Sovereto D, Troiano G, Melillo M, Di Cosola M, Cazzolla AP, Laino L, Lo Muzio L. Autotransplantation of the third molar: A therapeutic alternative to the rehabilitation of a missing tooth: a scoping review. Bioengineering. 2021; 8: 120. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8090120 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.