Čes. stomatol. Prakt. zub. lék. (Czech Dental Journal) 2004; 104(1): 3-8

Profilometric Analysis on the Surface of Composite Materials

P. Pírek, M. Kopřiva
II. stomatologická klinika LF UP, Olomouc, přednosta prof. MUDr. M. Eber, CSc. Společná laboratoř optiky Univerzity Palackého a Fyzikálního ústavu AV ČR, Olomouc, vedoucí doc. RNDr. M. Hrabovský, DrSc.

The optimum way to polish composite materials in the physician's consulting room and in the dental laboratory remains an open question. The authors analyzed the surface of samples of laboratory composites after polishing. Different ways of polishing of the hybridglass polymer Artglass and a more recent microfilled glass polymer Signum produced by Heraeus-Kulzer were compared. The roughness of surface was measured by the method of Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). At the level of AFM the microfilled glass polymer Signumproved to be polished better than the Artglass material. In the samples of glass polymer composite Artglass polished with the Opal paste or a combination of the HP paste and the polishing suspension Sitol, better results were reached than with the polishing by the HP pastere commended by the producer. The time polishing played a positive role in the quality of polished sample.

Keywords: composite resins; polyglas; dental polishing; atomic force microscopy (AFM)

Published: March 1, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pírek P, Kopřiva M. Profilometric Analysis on the Surface of Composite Materials. Čes. stomatol. Prakt. zub. lék. 2004;104(1):3-8.
Download citation

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.