Čes. stomatol. Prakt. zub. lék. (Czech Dental Journal) 2008; 108(5): 109-116

Do Self-Etching Adhesive Systems Improve Reliability of Dentin Bonding? In Vitro Study

P. Bradna*, M. Dudek, A. Roubíčková, M. Mikšovský, R. Vrbová, D. Houšová
Výzkumný ústav stomatologický 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha

A shear bond strength and fractography analysis was used to evaluate reliability of nine total- and self-etching adhesives OptiBond FL, Gluma Comfort Bond, Prime&Bond NT, AdheSE, Adper Prompt, Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil SE Bond, Xeno III and iBond. A critical bond strength at which 10 % samples failed was used as a measure of the adhesive reliability. Significant differences in reliability and also in mode of their fracture were found between total- and self-etching systems and also in adhesives in these groups. The highest reliability and mixed mode of fracture were found with group of classical total-etch 3- and 2-step adhesives OptiBond FL a Gluma Comfort Bond and also with 2-step self-etching AdheSE and Clearfil SE Bond. With these adhesives both high bond strength and highly predictable properties can be expected. Compromised reliability as manifested in decreased bond strength and predominantly less energetically demanding cohesive fractures of the adhesive layer or less frequently mixed fractures occurred for Adper Promt, iBond a Xeno III. On the other hand, Prime & Bond NT and especially Adper Prompt L-Pop in blisters were characterized as systems with a low reliability. Adhesive properties of self-etching systems might decrease as a result of aging processes during their shelf-life.

Keywords: dentin; adhesives; bond strength; reliability

Published: December 1, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bradna P, Dudek M, Roubíčková A, Mikšovský M, Vrbová R, Houšová D. Do Self-Etching Adhesive Systems Improve Reliability of Dentin Bonding? In Vitro Study. Čes. stomatol. Prakt. zub. lék. 2008;108(5):109-116.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ADA. Dentin and Enamel Adhesive Materials. Acceptance Program Guidelines, 2001, Council on Scientific Affairs.
    2. Bona, A. D., Anusavice, K. J. Mecholsky, J. J. Jr.: Failure analysis of resin composite bonded to ceramic. Dent. Mater., roč. 19, 2003, č. 8, s. 693-699. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Carvalho, R. M., Chersoni, S., Frankenberger, R. et al.: A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials, roč. 26, 2005, č. 9, s. 1035-1042. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. De Munck, J., Van Landuyt, K., Peumans, M. et al.: A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J. Dent. Res., roč. 84, 2005, č. 2, s. 118-1132. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Dias, W. R., Pereira, P. N. Swift, E. J. Jr.: Effect of bur type on microtensile bond strengths of self-etching systems to human dentin. J. Adhes. Dent., roč. 6, 2004, č. 3, s. 195-203.
    6. Hashimoto, M., Tay, F. R., Svizero, N. R. et al.: The effects of common errors on sealing ability of total-etch adhesives. Dent. Mater., roč. 22, 2006, č. 6, s. 560-568. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Heintze, S. D.: Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II: The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J. Adhes. Dent., roč. 9, 2007, č. 1, s. 77-106.
    8. ISO. Technical Specification ISO/TS 11405: 2003(E) Dental materials - Testing of adhesion to tooth structure.
    9. Jacobsen, T. Soderholm, K. J.: Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent. Mater., roč. 11, 1995, č. 2, s. 132-136. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Jacobsen, T., Soderholm, K. J., Yang, M. et al.: Effect of composition and complexity of dentin-bonding agents on operator variability-analysis of gap formation using confocal microscopy. Eur J. Oral. Sci., roč. 111, 2003, č. 6, s. 523-528. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. McCabe, J. F. Carrick, T. E.: A statistical approach to the mechanical testing of dental materials. Dent. Mater., roč. 2, 1986, č. 4, s. 139-142. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Pashley, E. L., Agee, K. A., Pashley, D. H. et al.: Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J. Dent., roč. 30, 2002, č. 2-3, s. 83-90. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Perinka, L., Sano, H. Hosoda, H.: Dentin thickness, hardness, and Ca-concentration vs bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent. Mater., roč. 8, 1992, č. 4, s. 229-233. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Peumans, M., Kanumilli, P., De Munck, J. et al.: Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent. Mater., roč. 21, 2005, č. 9, s. 864-881. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Ritter, J. E.: Predicting lifetimes of materials and material structures. Dent. Mater., roč. 11, 1995, č. 2, s. 142-146. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Sadr, A., Ghasemi, A., Shimada, Y. et al.: Effects of storage time and temperature on the properties of two self-etching systems. J. Dent., roč. 35, 2007, č. 3, s. 218-225. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Salz, U., Zimmermann, J., Zeuner, F. et al.: Hydrolytic stability of self-etching adhesive systems. J. Adhes. Dent., roč. 7, 2005, č. 2, s. 107-116.
    18. Sano, H., Kanemura, N., Burrow, M. F. et al.: Effect of operator variability on dentin adhesion: students vs. dentists. Dent. Mater. J., roč. 17, 1998, č. 1, s. 51-58. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Sano, H., Shono, T., Sonoda, H. et al.: Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength - Evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent. Mater., roč. 10, 1994, č. 4, s. 236-240. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Sano, H., Shono, T., Takatsu, T. et al.: Microporous dentin zone beneath resin-impregnated layer. Oper. Dent., roč. 19, 1994, č. 2, s. 59-64.
    21. Sano, H., Takatsu, T., Ciucchi, B. et al.: Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper. Dent, roč. 20, 1995, č. 1, s. 18-25.
    22. Schreiner, R. F., Chappell, R. P., Glaros, A. G. et al.: Microtensile testing of dentin adhesives. Dent. Mater., roč. 14, 1998, č. 3, s. 194-201. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Soderholm, K. J., Guelmann, M. Bimstein, E.: Shear bond strength of one 4th and two 7th generation bonding agents when used by operators with different bonding experience. J. Adhes. Dent., roč. 7, 2005, č. 1, s. 57-64.
    24. Tay, F. R., Gwinnett, J. A. Wei, S. H.: Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent. Mater., roč. 12, 1996, č. 4, s. 236-244. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    25. Tay, F. R. Pashley, D. H.: Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent. Mater., roč. 17, 2001, č. 4, s. 296-308. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    26. Tay, F. R., Pashley, D. H., Suh, B. I. et al.: Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J. Dent., roč. 30, 2002, č. 7-8, s. 371-382. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. Van Landuyt, K. L., De Munck, J., Snauwaert, J. et al.: Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J. Dent. Res., roč. 84, 2005, č. 2, s. 183-188. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    28. Van Meerbeek, B., Inokoshi, S., Braem, M. et al.: Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J. Dent. Res., roč. 71, 1992, č. 8, s. 1530-1540. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Van Noort, R., Cardew, G. E., Howard, I. C. et al.: The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin. J. Dent. Res., roč. 70, 1991, č. 5, s. 889-893. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. Versluis, A., Tantbirojn, D. Douglas, W. H.: Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J. Dent. Res., roč. 76, 1997, č. 6, s. 1298-1307. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    31. Wang, Y. Spencer, P.: Continuing etching of an all-in-one adhesive in wet dentin tubules. J. Dent. Res., roč. 84, 2005, č. 4, s. 350-354. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content