Čes. stomatol. Prakt. zub. lék. (Czech Dental Journal) 2020; 120(3): 78-87 | DOI: 10.51479/cspzl.2020.019

THE MARGINAL AND INTERNAL FIT OF COCR ALLOY SINGLE CROWNS WITH PREPARATION DESIGNS INCLUDING AUXILIARY FEATURES; CAD/CAM VERSUS CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUE

K. Walczak*, D. Friedrichs, H. Meissner, K. Boening
Oddělení protetické stomatologie, Lékařská fakulta Carla Gustava Caruse, Technická univerzita, Drážďany, SRN

Objectives: Evaluation of the influence of complex tooth preparation designs with incorporated auxiliary features on the marginal and internal fit of computer-aided design (CAD), and either additive (SLM) or subtractive (milling) computer-aided manufactured (CAM) and conventionally cast CoCr alloy single crowns (SC).

Material and methods: Artificial teeth were prepared with four different preparation designs: chamfer standard preparation (SP, as control), chamfer preparation with occlusal isthmus (OP), chamfer preparation with proximal boxes (BP) and chamfer preparation with buccal/lingual grooves (GP). Five crowns were made from each preparation design by cast technique (CT), milling technique (MT) and selective laser melting (SLM). The marginal and internal fit of the crowns was analysed by the silicone replica technique. The internal fit was evaluated by measuring axial, occlusal and gaps within auxiliary features. Mean and maximal gap widths values were evaluated. The Kruskal-Wallis test and U-test (Bonferroni adjusted) were used for the statistical analysis (p ≤ 0.05).

Results: For SP and OP, the marginal fit was similar between CT and MT as well as between CT and SLM. For SP and OP, the occlusal gaps were the lowest for CT and significantly different to SLM. For BP and GP, the marginal fit was statistically significantly better for CT than MT. The internal fit for BP and GP was best for CT.

Conclusions: Within all preparation designs with auxiliary features, only the CT achieved clinically acceptable values for both marginal and internal fit. Tested CAD/CAM systems and their software versions need further improvement to implement preparation designs with auxiliary features.

Keywords: marginal fit; internal fit; CAD, CAM; milling; SLM; sintering; casting technique

Published: September 1, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Walczak K, Friedrichs D, Meissner H, Boening K. THE MARGINAL AND INTERNAL FIT OF COCR ALLOY SINGLE CROWNS WITH PREPARATION DESIGNS INCLUDING AUXILIARY FEATURES; CAD/CAM VERSUS CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUE. Čes. stomatol. Prakt. zub. lék. 2020;120(3):78-87. doi: 10.51479/cspzl.2020.019.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Gilboe DB, Teteruck WR. Fundamentals of extracoronal tooth preparation. Part I. Retention and resistance form. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94(2): 105-107. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.02.018. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: An art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85(4): 363-376. doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114685. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Lu PC, Wilson P. Effect of auxiliary grooves on molar crown preparations lacking resistance form: a laboratory study. J Prosthodont. 2008; 17(2): 85-91. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00263.x. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Naik VA, Jurel SK. Comparative analysis of auxiliary retentive factors affecting retention of complete cast metal crown. Int J Stomatol Occlusion Med. 2010; 3(4): 195-199. doi:10.1007/s12548-011-0070-z. Go to original source...
    5. Papadiochou S, Pissiotis AL. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119(4): 545-551. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.001. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Oilo M, Nesse H, Lundberg OJ, Gjerdet NR. Mechanical properties of cobalt-chromium 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by casting, milling, and additive manufacturing. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120(1): 156.e151-156.e157. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.007. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Nesse H, Ulstein DMÅ, Vaage MM, Øilo M. Internal and marginal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses fabricated with 3 different techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114(5): 686-692. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.05.007. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Davidowitz G, Kotick PG. The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dental Clin. 2011; 55(3): 559-570. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Ahmed KE. We're going digital: the current state of CAD/CAM dentistry in prosthodontics. Prim Dent J, 2018; 7(2): 30-35. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Sun J, Zhang FQ. The application of rapid prototyping in prosthodontics. J Prosthodont. 2012; 21(8): 641-644. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y. CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Aust Dent J. 2011; 56, Suppl. 1: 97-106. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01300.x. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res. 2016; 60(2): 72-84. doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2016.01.003. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Koutsoukis T, Zinelis S, Eliades G, Al-Wazzan K, Rifaiy MA, Al Jabbari YS. Selective laser melting technique of co-cr dental alloys: A review of structure and properties and comparative analysis with other available techniques. J Prosthodont. 2015; 24(4): 303-312. doi:10.1111/jopr.12268. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Gunsoy S, Ulusoy M. Evaluation of marginal/internal fit of chrome-cobalt crowns: Direct laser metal sintering versus computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing. Niger J Clin Pract. 2016; 19(5): 636-644. doi:10.4103/1119-3077.188699. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Huang Z, Zhang L, Zhu J, Zhao Y, Zhang X. Clinical marginal and internal fit of crowns fabricated using different CAD/CAM technologies. J Prosthodont. 2015; 24(4): 291-295. doi:10.1111/jopr.12209. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Tara MA, Eschbach S, Bohlsen F, Kern M. Clinical outcome of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with laser-sintering technology. Int J Prosthodont. 2011; 24(1): 46-48.
    17. Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater. 1985; 1(5): 197-199. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971; 131(3): 107-111. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Papadiochou S, Pissiotis AL. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 119(4): 545-551. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.001. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Jorgensen KD, Esbensen AL. The relationship between the film thickness of zinc phosphate cement and the retention of veneer crowns. Acta Odontol Scand. 1968; 26(3): 169-175. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. May LG, Kelly JR, Bottino MA, Hill T. Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: Multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing. Dent Mater. 2012; 28(8): 99-109. doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.033. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. Tamac E, Toksavul S, Toman M. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112(4): 909-913. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.020. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Huang Z, Zhang L, Zhu J, Zhang X. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 113(6): 623-627. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.10.012. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    24. Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dent Mater. 2008; 24(10): 1311-1315. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    25. Castillo-Oyagüe R, Lynch CD, Turrión AS, López-Lozano JF, Torres-Lagares D, Suárez-García MJ. Misfit and microleakage of implant-supported crown copings obtained by laser sintering and casting techniques, luted with glass-ionomer, resin cements and acrylic/urethane-based agents. J Dent. 2013; 41(1): 90-96. doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.09.014. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    26. Dahl BE, Ronold HJ, Dahl JE. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117(3): 400-404. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.06.017. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. Kim EH, Lee DH, Kwon SM, Kwon TY. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 117(3): 393-399. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.002. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    28. Kim KB, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH. An evaluation of marginal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by direct metal laser sintering system. Dent Mater. 2013; 29(7): 91-96. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Myszka D, Skrodzki M. Comparison of dental prostheses cast and sintered by SLM from Co-Cr-Mo-W alloy. Arch Foundry Eng. 2016; 16(4): 201-207. Go to original source...
    30. Örtorp A, Jönsson D, Mouhsen A, von Steyern PV. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: A comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater. 2011; 27(4): 356-363. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    31. Pompa G, Di Carlo S, De Angelis F, Cristalli MP, Annibali S. Comparison of conventional methods and laser-assisted rapid prototyping for manufacturing fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study. Biomed Res Int. 2015: 318097. doi:10.1155/2015/318097. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    32. Suleiman SH, Vult von Steyern P. Fracture strength of porcelain fused to metal crowns made of cast, milled or laser-sintered cobalt-chromium. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013; 71(5): 1280-1289. doi:10.3109/00016357.2012.757650. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    33. Tuna SH, Özçiçek Pekmez N, Kürkçüoğlu I. Corrosion resistance assessment of Co-Cr alloy frameworks fabricated by CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and casting methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114(5): 725-734. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.031. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    34. Ucar Y, Akova T, Akyil MS, Brantley WA. Internal fit evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown fabrication technique: laser-sintered Co-Cr crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 102(4): 253-259. doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(09)60165-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    35. Zeng L, Xiang N, Wei B. A comparison of corrosion resistance of cobalt-chromium-molybdenum metal ceramic alloy fabricated with selective laser melting and traditional processing. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112(5): 1217-1224. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.018. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    36. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62(4): 405-408. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    37. Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kastner K, Walter MH. Clinical fit of procera allceram crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84(4): 419-424. doi:10.1067/mpr.2000.109125. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    38. Bjorn AL, Bjorn H, Grkovic B. Marginal fit of restorations and its relation to periodontal bone level. II. Crowns. Odontol Rev. 1970; 21(3): 337-346.
    39. Son YH, Han CH, Kim S. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing. J Dent. 2012; 40(10): 866-872. doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.007. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    40. Wiskott HW, Belser UC, Scherrer SS. The effect of film thickness and surface texture on the resistance of cemented extracoronal restorations to lateral fatigue loading. Int J Prosthodont. 1999; 12(3): 255-262.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content