Čes. stomatol. Prakt. zub. lék. (Czech Dental Journal) 2021; 121(2): 48-54 | DOI: 10.51479/cspzl.2021.007

DENTAL COMPOSITE FILLING MATERIALS AS A POTENTIAL RISK OF TOXICITY FOR HUMAN ORGANISM

Tkáčiková S., Sabo J.
Ústav lekárskej a klinickej biofyziky, Lekárska fakulta UPJŠ, Košice, Slovenská republika

Introduction, aim: Composite materials used in dentistry are increasingly used for several reasons - aesthetics, hypersensitivity of some individuals to amalgam and concerns about the possible release of amalgam metals, and at the same time limiting its use due to the negative impact on the environment both during production and disposal. Composite materials consist of monomers, filler, polymerization initiation system and other substances that improve the properties of the filler. After application to the cavity, the filler material solidifies by a polymerization process which is initiated chemically, by light or dual. The conversion of monomers used in dentistry will never reach 100%, which is one of the weaknesses of these materials. Upon contact of the composite materials with water, alcohol as well as an acidic environment, it has been found that some components, such as non-polymerized monomers, can be gradually released from the composite. In the oral cavity, composite fillings are exposed to the constant action of saliva as well as food and beverages, which affect the release of composite components. They can cause local allergic reactions, but they can also affect the whole human body by swallowing saliva-containing monomers.

Methods: In this work, the amount of unpolymerized monomers released from selected composite materials, prepared in the shape of a cylinder with a height of approx. 2 mm and diameter of 3 mm, weighing approximately 0.05 g and cured - polymerised according to the procedure specified by the manufacturer, was determined. Subsequently, the composites were immersed in unstimulated saliva at 37 °C and the amount of monomers released was determined at several time intervals. A high performance liquid chromatography with a UV detector was used for saliva analysis. The amount of monomers released into saliva over time from the curing of the composite was monitored.

Results: During the elution of monomers from composite fillers into saliva, their amount gradually increases, different monomers leach out at different concentration levels. The largest amount of released monomers was measured from composite materials containing triethylene glycol dimethacrylate, while bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate was eluted in the smallest quantity.

Conclusion: Due to the relatively high levels of released monomers, it is important in the development of composite materials to monitor their levels in saliva in the first hours after application as well as in the long term in order to produce a more biologically compatible composite.

Keywords: composite material, saliva, monomer release, chromatography

Accepted: May 7, 2021; Published: June 6, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Tkáčiková S, Sabo J. DENTAL COMPOSITE FILLING MATERIALS AS A POTENTIAL RISK OF TOXICITY FOR HUMAN ORGANISM. Čes. stomatol. Prakt. zub. lék. 2021;121(2):48-54. doi: 10.51479/cspzl.2021.007.
Download citation

References

  1. Carvalho JC, Schiffner U. Dental Caries in European Adults and Senior Citizens 1996-2016: ORCA Saturday Afternoon Symposium in Greifswald, Germany - Part II, Caries Res. 2019; 53: 242-252. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Lempel E, Czibulya Z, Kunsági-Máté S, Szalma J, Sümegi B, Böddi K. Quantification of conversion degree and monomer elution from dental composite using HPLC and Micro-Raman spectroscopy. Chromatographia. 2014; 77(17-18): 1137-1144. Go to original source...
  3. Lempel E, Czibulya Z, Kovács B, Szalma J, Tóth Á, Kunsági-Máté S, Varga Z, Böddi K. Degree of conversion and Bis-GMA, TEGDMA, UDMA elution from flowable bulk fill composites. Int J Mol Sci. 2016; 17(5): 732. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Gupta SK, Saxena P, Pant AV, Pant AB. Release and toxicity of dental resin composite. Toxicol Int. 2012; 19(3): 225-234. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Reichl FX, Esters M, Simon S, Seiss M, Kehe K, Kleinsasser N. Cell death effects of resin-based dental material compounds and mercurials in human gingival fibroblasts. Arch Toxicol. 2006; 80: 370-377. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Geurtsen W, Lehmann F, Sphal W, Leyhausen G. Cytotoxicity of 35 dental resin composite monomers/additives in permanent 3T3 and three human primary fibroblasts cultures. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998; 41: 474-480. Go to original source...
  7. Yoshii E. Cytotoxic effects of acrylates and methacrylates: relationships of monomer structures and cytotoxicity. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997; 37: 517-524. Go to original source...
  8. Al-Hiyasat AS, Darmani H, Milhem MM. Cytotoxicity evaluation of dental resin composites and their flowable derivatives. Clin Oral Invest. 2005; 9: 21-25. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Darmani H, Al-Hiyasat AS. The effect of Bis-GMA and TEG-DMA on female mouse fertility. Dent Mater. 2006; 22: 353-358. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Dursun E, Fron-Chabouis H, Attal JP, Raskin A. Bisphenol A release: Survey of the composition of dental composite resins. Open Dent J. 2016; 10: 446-453. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Cebe MA, Cebe F, Cengiz MF, Cetin AR, Arpag OF, Ozturk B. Elution of monomer from different bulk fill dental composite resins. Dent Mater. 2015; 31(7): e141-149. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Gerzinaab TM, Humeab WR. Diffusion of monomers from bonding resin-resin composite combinations through dentine in vitro. J Dent. 1996; 24(1-2): 125-128. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Holz J, Pashley D. Dentinal fluid dynamics in human teeth, in vivo. J Endod. 1995; 21(4): 191-194. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Van Landuyt KL, Nawrot T, Geebelen B, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Yoshihara K, Scheers H, Godderis L, Hoet P, Van Meerbeek B. How much do resin-based dental materials release? A meta-analytical approach. Dent Mater. 2011; 27(8): 723-747. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Sasaki N, Okuda K, Kato T, Kakishima H, Okuma H, Abe K, Tachino H, Tuchida K, Kubono K. Salivary bisphenol-A levels detected by ELISA after restoration with composite resin. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005; 16(4): 297-300. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Rueggeberg FA, Dlugokinski M, Ergle JW. Minimizing patients' exposure to uncured components in a dental sealant. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999; 130(12): 1751-1757. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Komurcuoglu E, Olmez S, Vural N. Evaluation of residual monomer elimination methods in three different fissure sealants in vitro. J Oral Rehabil. 2005; 32(2): 116-121. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Pongprueksa P, De Munck J, Duca RC, Poels K, Covaci A, Hoet P, Godderis L, Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt KL. Monomer elution in relation to degree of conversion for different types of composite. J Dent. 2015; 43(12): 1448-1455. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.