Čes. stomatol. Prakt. zub. lék. (Czech Dental Journal) 2023; 123(3): 68-76 | DOI: 10.51479/cspzl.2023.005

DENTAL MODELS CREATED BY INTRAORAL SCANNING AND 3D PRINTING

Šimek M.
Stomatologická klinika dětí a dospělých, Univerzita Karlova, 2. lékařská fakulta, a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha

Introduction and aim: Dental models are widely used in dentistry. The transmission of oral cavity situation outside patient's mouth brings us information in the field of diagnostics, treatment planning, and the fabrication planning of dental products. Dental models can be used in any dental field. They are particularly linked to prosthodontics, orthodontics, and maxillofacial surgery. The aim of this article is to report the benefits of the intraoral scanning in conjuction with 3D printing to the reader. Also, it describes their basic principles and presents the most useful technologies of 3D printing for production in dentistry according to the current literature.

Materials and methods: The literature search and survey were focused on intraoral scanning and 3D printing. PubMed, Scopus, and Ebsco databases were used to find the articles. Their applicability in dentistry, the inclusion of a control group, and the age of the article within five years were essential for their subsequent selection.

Conclusion: The included studies show that the technologies of direct intraoral scanning and 3D printing are already clinically usable today, and in the future we can expect their further development for everyday practice.

Keywords: dental models, intraoral scanner, 3D printing

Received: August 30, 2021; Revised: April 25, 2023; Accepted: April 25, 2023; Prepublished online: August 29, 2023; Published: September 11, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šimek M. DENTAL MODELS CREATED BY INTRAORAL SCANNING AND 3D PRINTING. Čes. stomatol. Prakt. zub. lék. 2023;123(3):68-76. doi: 10.51479/cspzl.2023.005.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Kamínek M, et al. Ortodoncie. 1. vydání. Praha: Galén; 2014, 45-49.
    2. Hubálková H, Krňoulová J. Materiály a technologie v protetickém zubním lékařství. 1. vydání. Praha: Galén; 2009, 135-158.
    3. Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, Chen CJ, Feng IJ, Ercoli C. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116(2): 184-190.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.017. Epub 2016 Mar 2. PMID: 26946916. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17: 149. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Goracci C, Franchi L, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Eur J Orthod. 2016; 38(4): 422-428. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv077. Epub 2015 Oct 20. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann WH, Reich S. Intraoral scanning systems - a current overview. Int J Comput Dent. 2015; 18(2): 101-129. English, German. PMID: 26110925.
    7. Grünheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthop Dentofac Orthod. 2014; 146(5): 673-682. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.023. Epub 2014 Oct 28. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Lee SJ, Gallucci G. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24(1): 111-115. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02430.x. Epub 2012 Feb 22. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Akyalcin S, Dyer DJ, English JD, Sar C. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 144(6): 831-837. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.08.014 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Joda T, Brägger U, Gallucci G. Systematic literature review of digital three-dimensional superimposition techniques to create virtual dental patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015; 30(2): 330-337. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3852 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Lim JH, Park JM, Kim M, Heo SJ, Myung JY. Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 225-232. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jul 8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Imburgia M, Logozzo S, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Mangano C, Mangano FG. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17(1): 92. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Marghalani A, Weber HP, Finkelman M, Kudara Y, El Rafie K, Papaspyridakos P. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: An evaluation of accuracy. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 574-579. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Sep 18. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115(3): 313-320. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Nov 6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Kattadiyil MT, Mursic Z, Airumaih H, Goodacre CJ. Intraoral scanning of hard and soft tissues for partial removable dental prosthesis fabrication. J Posthet Dent. 2014; 112(3): 444-448. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 May 29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Yilmaz H, et al. Time efficiency and accuracy of three-dimensional models versus dental casts: A clinical study. Turk J Orthod. 2019; 32(4): 214-218. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.19034. eCollection 2019 Dec. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Ahmad I, Al-Harbi F. 3D printing in dentistry 2019/2020. 1. vydání. London: Quintessence, 2019, 22-46. Go to original source...
    18. Mörmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137(Suppl.): 7S-13S. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A, Mäkynen A. Recent advances in dental optics - Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Optics Lasers in Engineering. 2014; 54: 203-221. Go to original source...
    20. Hack GD, Sebastian B, Panzelt M. Evaluation of the accuracy of six intraoral scanning devices: An in-vitro investigation. ADA Professional Product Rev. 2015; 10: 1-5.
    21. Imburgia M, Logozzo S, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Mangano C, Mangano FG. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17(1): 92. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Schurch Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, Lauer A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: an in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 118(1): 36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Dec 23. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Roig E, Garza LC, Álvarez-Maldonado N, Maia P, Costa S, Roig M, Espona J. In vitro comparison of the accuracy of four intraoral scanners and three conventional impression methods for two neighboring implants. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15(2): e0228266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228266. eCollection 2020. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    24. Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Nyström I, Thor A. Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18: 27. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0489-3 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    25. Nedelcu R, Persson ASK. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 1461-1471. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Aug 16. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    26. Güth JF, Runkel C, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Keul C. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization. Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21(5): 1445-1455. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1902-4. Epub 2016 Jul 12. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. Kašparová M, Halamová S, Dostálová T, Procházka A. Intra-oral 3D scanning for the digital evaluation of dental arch parameters. Appl Sci. 2018; 8: 1838. Go to original source...
    28. Zarone F, Ruggiero G, Ferrari M, Mangano F, Joda T, Sorrentino R. Comparison of different intraoral scanning techniques on the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 124: e1-e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.017. Epub 2020 Oct 24. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. 29 Tsirogiannis P, Reissmann DR, Heydecke G. Evaluation of the marginal fit of single-unit, complete-coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impressions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 16(3): 328-335. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.028. Epub 2016 Apr 7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. Oberoi G, Nitsch S, Edlmayer M, Janijć K, Müller AS, Agis H. 3D-Encompassing the fact of dentistry. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018; 6: 172. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00172. eCollection 2018. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    31. Wu H, et al. Recent developments in polymers/polymer nanocomposites for additive manufacturing. Progress in Materials Science. 2020; 111: 100638. Go to original source...
    32. Jockusch J, Özcan M. Additive manufacturing of dental polymers: an overview on processes, materials and applications. Dent Mater J. 2020;39(3):345-354. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-123. Epub 2020 Feb 7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    33. Jones R, Haufe P, Sells E, et al. RepRap - the replicationg rapid prototyper. Robotica. 2011; 29: 177-191. Go to original source...
    34. Chia HN, Wu BM. Recent advantages in 3D printing of biomaterials. J Biol Eng. 2015; 9: 4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    35. Quan H, Zhang T, Xu H, Luo S, Nie J, Zhu X. Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges. Bioac Mater. 2020; 5: 110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.003. eCollection 2020 Mar. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    36. Stříteský O, Průša J, Bach M. Základy 3D tisku s Josefem Průšou. 1. vydání. Praha: Prusa Research; 2019.
    37. Schaub DA, Chu KR, Montgomery DC. Optimizing stereolithography throughput. J Manuf Syst. 1997; 16(4): 18-27. Go to original source...
    38. Tumbleston JR, Shirvanyants D, Ermoshkin N, Janusziewicz R, Johnson AR, Kelly D, Chen K, Pinschmidt R, Rolland JP, Ermoshkin A, Samulski ET, DeSimone JM. Additive manufacturing. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science. 2015; 347(6228): 1349-1352. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa2397. Epub 2015 Mar 16. PMID: 25780246. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    39. Fernandez-Vicente M, Caller W, Ferrandiz S, Conejero A. Effect of infill parameters on tensile mechanical behavior in deskop 3D printing. 3D printing and additive manufacturing. 2016; 3(3): 183-192. doi: 10.3390/polym12122962 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    40. Mangano F, Chambrone L, van Noort R, Miller C, Hatton P, Mangano C. Direct metal laser sintering titanium dental implants: a review of the current literature. Int J Biomater. 2014; 2014: 461534. doi: 10.1155/2014/461534. Epub 2014 Dec 1. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    41. Camardella LT, de Vasconcellos Vilella O, Breuning H. Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 151(6): 1178-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.012 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    42. Kim SY, et al. Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018; 153: 144-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.05.025 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    43. Brown GB, Currier GF, Kadioglu O, Kieri JP. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018; 154: 733-739. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.06.009 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    44. Sherman SL, Kadioglu O, Currier GF, Kierl JP, Li J. Accuracy of digital light processing printing of 3-dimensional dental models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020; 157: 422-428. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.10.012 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    45. Erickson DM, et al. An opinion survey of reported benefits from the use of stereolithographic models. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999; 57; 1040-1043. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90322-1 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    46. Moztarzadeh O, Hrušák D, Bolek L, Bolek M. On site 3D printing in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Plzeň. Lék Sborník. 81, 2015: 29-32.
    47. Methani MM, Revilla-León M, Zandinejad A. The potential of additive manufacturing technologies and their processing parameters for the fabrication of all-ceramic crowns: A review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020; 32(2): 182-192. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12535. Epub 2019 Nov 7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    48. Ahmad I, Al-Harbi F. 3D printing in dentistry 2019/2020. 1. vydání. London: Quintessence, 2019, 136-153.
    49. Azari A, Nikzad S. The event of rapid prototyping in dentistry: a review. Rapid Prototype J. 2009; 15: 216-225. Go to original source...
    50. Byun C, Kim C, Cho S, Baek SH, Kim G, Kim SG, Kim SY. Endodontic treatment of an anomalous anterior tooth with the aid of a 3-dimensional printed physical tooth model. J Endod. 2015; 41(6): 961-965. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.016. Epub 2015 Feb 27. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    51. Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov Al. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod. 2008; 35: 191-201. doi: 10.1179/146531207225022626 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    52. Creekmore TD, Kunik RL. Straight wire: the next generation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993; 104(1): 8-20. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70023-H Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    53. Graf S, Cornelis MA, Hauber Gameiro G, Cattaneo PM. Computer-aided design and manufacture of hyrax devices: Can we really go digital? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017; 152(6): 870-874. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.06.016 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    54. Edelmann A, English JD, Chen SJ, Kasper FK. Analysis of the thickness of 3-dimensional-printed orthodontic aligners. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020; 158: e91-e98. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.07.029 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    55. Jindal P, Juneja M, Siena FL, Bajaj D, Breedon P. Mechanical and geometric properties of thermoformed and 3D printed clear dental aligners. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 156(5): 694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.012. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    56. Šrubař M, Dostálová T, Hofmanová P, Foltán R, Eliášová H. Úvod do 3D plánování ortognátních operací. 3D simulace ortognátní operace v programu Dolphin Imaging 3D. Čes stomatol Prakt zubní lék. 2015; 115(2): 36-45. doi: 10.51479/cspzl.2015.007 Go to original source...
    57. Savková N, Harvan Ľ, Jusku A, Saygili S, Jezdinská K, Hulvert J. Souhrn poznatků o 3D tisku a jeho využití v zubním lékařství. Čes stomatol Prakt zubní lék. 2021; 121(2): 55-64. doi: 10.51479/cspzl.2021.008 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content